May 21, 2013
neurosciencestuff:

Complex brain function depends on flexibility
Over the past few decades, neuroscientists have made much progress in mapping the brain by deciphering the functions of individual neurons that perform very specific tasks, such as recognizing the location or color of an object.
However, there are many neurons, especially in brain regions that perform sophisticated functions such as thinking and planning, that don’t fit into this pattern. Instead of responding exclusively to one stimulus or task, these neurons react in different ways to a wide variety of things. MIT neuroscientist Earl Miller first noticed these unusual activity patterns about 20 years ago, while recording the electrical activity of neurons in animals that were trained to perform complex tasks.
“We started noticing early on that there are a whole bunch of neurons in the prefrontal cortex that can’t be classified in the traditional way of one message per neuron,” recalls Miller, the Picower Professor of Neuroscience at MIT and a member of MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory.
In a paper appearing in Nature on May 19, Miller and colleagues at Columbia University report that these neurons are essential for complex cognitive tasks, such as learning new behavior. The Columbia team, led by the study’s senior author, Stefano Fusi, developed a computer model showing that without these neurons, the brain can learn only a handful of behavioral tasks.
“You need a significant proportion of these neurons,” says Fusi, an associate professor of neuroscience at Columbia. “That gives the brain a huge computational advantage.”
Lead author of the paper is Mattia Rigotti, a former grad student in Fusi’s lab.
Multitasking neurons
Miller and other neuroscientists who first identified this neuronal activity observed that while the patterns were difficult to predict, they were not random. “In the same context, the neurons always behave the same way. It’s just that they may convey one message in one task, and a totally different message in another task,” Miller says.
For example, a neuron might distinguish between colors during one task, but issue a motor command under different conditions.
Miller and colleagues proposed that this type of neuronal flexibility is key to cognitive flexibility, including the brain’s ability to learn so many new things on the fly. “You have a bunch of neurons that can be recruited for a whole bunch of different things, and what they do just changes depending on the task demands,” he says.
At first, that theory encountered resistance “because it runs against the traditional idea that you can figure out the clockwork of the brain by figuring out the one thing each neuron does,” Miller says.
For the new Nature study, Fusi and colleagues at Columbia created a computer model to determine more precisely what role these flexible neurons play in cognition, using experimental data gathered by Miller and his former grad student, Melissa Warden. That data came from one of the most complex tasks that Miller has ever trained a monkey to perform: The animals looked at a sequence of two pictures and had to remember the pictures and the order in which they appeared.
During this task, the flexible neurons, known as “mixed selectivity neurons,” exhibited a great deal of nonlinear activity — meaning that their responses to a combination of factors cannot be predicted based on their response to each individual factor (such as one image).
Expanding capacity
Fusi’s computer model revealed that these mixed selectivity neurons are critical to building a brain that can perform many complex tasks. When the computer model includes only neurons that perform one function, the brain can only learn very simple tasks. However, when the flexible neurons are added to the model, “everything becomes so much easier and you can create a neural system that can perform very complex tasks,” Fusi says.
The flexible neurons also greatly expand the brain’s capacity to perform tasks. In the computer model, neural networks without mixed selectivity neurons could learn about 100 tasks before running out of capacity. That capacity greatly expanded to tens of millions of tasks as mixed selectivity neurons were added to the model. When mixed selectivity neurons reached about 30 percent of the total, the network’s capacity became “virtually unlimited,” Miller says — just like a human brain.
Mixed selectivity neurons are especially dominant in the prefrontal cortex, where most thought, learning and planning takes place. This study demonstrates how these mixed selectivity neurons greatly increase the number of tasks that this kind of neural network can perform, says John Duncan, a professor of neuroscience at Cambridge University.
“Especially for higher-order regions, the data that have often been taken as a complicating nuisance may be critical in allowing the system actually to work,” says Duncan, who was not part of the research team.
Miller is now trying to figure out how the brain sorts through all of this activity to create coherent messages. There is some evidence suggesting that these neurons communicate with the correct targets by synchronizing their activity with oscillations of a particular brainwave frequency.
“The idea is that neurons can send different messages to different targets by virtue of which other neurons they are synchronized with,” Miller says. “It provides a way of essentially opening up these special channels of communications so the preferred message gets to the preferred neurons and doesn’t go to neurons that don’t need to hear it.”

neurosciencestuff:

Complex brain function depends on flexibility

Over the past few decades, neuroscientists have made much progress in mapping the brain by deciphering the functions of individual neurons that perform very specific tasks, such as recognizing the location or color of an object.

However, there are many neurons, especially in brain regions that perform sophisticated functions such as thinking and planning, that don’t fit into this pattern. Instead of responding exclusively to one stimulus or task, these neurons react in different ways to a wide variety of things. MIT neuroscientist Earl Miller first noticed these unusual activity patterns about 20 years ago, while recording the electrical activity of neurons in animals that were trained to perform complex tasks.

“We started noticing early on that there are a whole bunch of neurons in the prefrontal cortex that can’t be classified in the traditional way of one message per neuron,” recalls Miller, the Picower Professor of Neuroscience at MIT and a member of MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory.

In a paper appearing in Nature on May 19, Miller and colleagues at Columbia University report that these neurons are essential for complex cognitive tasks, such as learning new behavior. The Columbia team, led by the study’s senior author, Stefano Fusi, developed a computer model showing that without these neurons, the brain can learn only a handful of behavioral tasks.

“You need a significant proportion of these neurons,” says Fusi, an associate professor of neuroscience at Columbia. “That gives the brain a huge computational advantage.”

Lead author of the paper is Mattia Rigotti, a former grad student in Fusi’s lab.

Multitasking neurons

Miller and other neuroscientists who first identified this neuronal activity observed that while the patterns were difficult to predict, they were not random. “In the same context, the neurons always behave the same way. It’s just that they may convey one message in one task, and a totally different message in another task,” Miller says.

For example, a neuron might distinguish between colors during one task, but issue a motor command under different conditions.

Miller and colleagues proposed that this type of neuronal flexibility is key to cognitive flexibility, including the brain’s ability to learn so many new things on the fly. “You have a bunch of neurons that can be recruited for a whole bunch of different things, and what they do just changes depending on the task demands,” he says.

At first, that theory encountered resistance “because it runs against the traditional idea that you can figure out the clockwork of the brain by figuring out the one thing each neuron does,” Miller says.

For the new Nature study, Fusi and colleagues at Columbia created a computer model to determine more precisely what role these flexible neurons play in cognition, using experimental data gathered by Miller and his former grad student, Melissa Warden. That data came from one of the most complex tasks that Miller has ever trained a monkey to perform: The animals looked at a sequence of two pictures and had to remember the pictures and the order in which they appeared.

During this task, the flexible neurons, known as “mixed selectivity neurons,” exhibited a great deal of nonlinear activity — meaning that their responses to a combination of factors cannot be predicted based on their response to each individual factor (such as one image).

Expanding capacity

Fusi’s computer model revealed that these mixed selectivity neurons are critical to building a brain that can perform many complex tasks. When the computer model includes only neurons that perform one function, the brain can only learn very simple tasks. However, when the flexible neurons are added to the model, “everything becomes so much easier and you can create a neural system that can perform very complex tasks,” Fusi says.

The flexible neurons also greatly expand the brain’s capacity to perform tasks. In the computer model, neural networks without mixed selectivity neurons could learn about 100 tasks before running out of capacity. That capacity greatly expanded to tens of millions of tasks as mixed selectivity neurons were added to the model. When mixed selectivity neurons reached about 30 percent of the total, the network’s capacity became “virtually unlimited,” Miller says — just like a human brain.

Mixed selectivity neurons are especially dominant in the prefrontal cortex, where most thought, learning and planning takes place. This study demonstrates how these mixed selectivity neurons greatly increase the number of tasks that this kind of neural network can perform, says John Duncan, a professor of neuroscience at Cambridge University.

“Especially for higher-order regions, the data that have often been taken as a complicating nuisance may be critical in allowing the system actually to work,” says Duncan, who was not part of the research team.

Miller is now trying to figure out how the brain sorts through all of this activity to create coherent messages. There is some evidence suggesting that these neurons communicate with the correct targets by synchronizing their activity with oscillations of a particular brainwave frequency.

“The idea is that neurons can send different messages to different targets by virtue of which other neurons they are synchronized with,” Miller says. “It provides a way of essentially opening up these special channels of communications so the preferred message gets to the preferred neurons and doesn’t go to neurons that don’t need to hear it.”

April 18, 2013

kaajoo:

World’s Most Beautiful Abandoned Places

Italian product manager and web designer Francesco Mugnai recently added a collection of images to his blog touting some of the most beautiful images of abandoned spots and modern ruins that he’d ever seen. The images Mugnai has captured come from empty castles, shuttered power plants, and dilapidated churches around the world. From a sunken yacht in Antarctica to a forever-closed amusement park in Japan, these images all make up a sort of anti-phoenix; rather than rising as new from the ashes, these husks remain preserved in decomposition, forcing viewers to confront the strange beauty of ruination.

(via pauldateh)

April 9, 2013
A Letter to Brian McDonald About Joseph Campbell

Brian,
The genius of Joseph Campbell—you would know much more about the subject than I do. But I love how he broke down stories from every culture and looked at what’s in common.
What I learned about stories from his interviews with Bill Moyers is that symbols and imagery plays a huge role in stories from all cultures. And that certain imagery is universal, they can just have different names. Sometimes an image is universal because its natural properties are universal and commonly observed by people. Take water for instance.
There’s a clip of him talking about the symbolic significance of water—it represents the subconscious or the unconscious. I thought about it and it made sense. If you submerge yourself in water you become unconscious. So the image of water is built from an observation of the natural world. 
Therefore you can’t use it whenever you feel like as some writers will have you believe. A story about a girl who drinks water is very different from a story where a girl drinks sulfuric acid.
I used to be confused by when it’s supposed to rain vs when its supposed to be sunny in my stories. Or at what time of day something should take place, or what the general atmosphere should be like. Now I’m clueing in on it, all thanks to Campbell.

 

Happy writing,

 

 

Jimmy

February 15, 2013
neurosciencestuff:

Love of musical harmony is not nature but nurture



Our love of music and appreciation of musical harmony is learnt and not based on natural ability – a new study by University of Melbourne researchers has found.



Associate Professor Neil McLachlan from the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said previous theories about how we appreciate music were based on the physical properties of sound, the ear itself and an innate ability to hear harmony.

“Our study shows that musical harmony can be learnt and it is a matter of training the brain to hear the sounds,” Associate Professor McLachlan said.
 “So if you thought that the music of some exotic culture (or Jazz) sounded like the wailing of cats, it’s simply because you haven’t learnt to listen by their rules.”

The researchers used 66 volunteers with a range of musical training and tested their ability to hear combinations of notes to determine if they found the combinations familiar or pleasing.

“What we found was that people needed to be familiar with sounds created by combinations of notes before they could hear the individual notes. If they couldn’t find the notes they found the sound dissonant or unpleasant,” he said.
 “This finding overturns centuries of theories that physical properties of the ear determine what we find appealing.”

Coauthor on the study Associate Professor Sarah Wilson also from the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said the study found that trained musicians were much more sensitive to dissonance than non-musicians.

“When they couldn’t find the note, the musicians reported that the sounds were unpleasant, whereas non-musicians were much less sensitive,” Assoc. Prof Wilson said.
 “This highlights the importance of training the brain to like particular variations of combinations of sounds like those found in jazz or rock.” 

Depending on their training, a strange chord or a gong sound was accurately pitched and pleasant to some musicians, but impossible to pitch and very unpleasant to others. “This showed us that even the ability to hear a musical pitch (or note) is learnt,” Assoc. Prof Wilson said.

To confirm this finding they trained 19 non-musicians to find the pitches of a random selection of western chords. Not only did the participants ability to hear notes improve rapidly over ten short sessions, afterward they reported that the chords they had learnt sounded more pleasant – regardless of how the chords were tuned.
The question of why some combinations of musical notes are heard as pleasant or unpleasant has long been debated. “We have shown in this study that for music, beauty is in the brain of the beholder,” Assoc. Prof McLachlan said. The study was published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

neurosciencestuff:

Love of musical harmony is not nature but nurture

Our love of music and appreciation of musical harmony is learnt and not based on natural ability – a new study by University of Melbourne researchers has found.

Associate Professor Neil McLachlan from the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said previous theories about how we appreciate music were based on the physical properties of sound, the ear itself and an innate ability to hear harmony.


“Our study shows that musical harmony can be learnt and it is a matter of training the brain to hear the sounds,” Associate Professor McLachlan said.
 “So if you thought that the music of some exotic culture (or Jazz) sounded like the wailing of cats, it’s simply because you haven’t learnt to listen by their rules.”


The researchers used 66 volunteers with a range of musical training and tested their ability to hear combinations of notes to determine if they found the combinations familiar or pleasing.


“What we found was that people needed to be familiar with sounds created by combinations of notes before they could hear the individual notes. If they couldn’t find the notes they found the sound dissonant or unpleasant,” he said.
 “This finding overturns centuries of theories that physical properties of the ear determine what we find appealing.”


Coauthor on the study Associate Professor Sarah Wilson also from the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said the study found that trained musicians were much more sensitive to dissonance than non-musicians.


“When they couldn’t find the note, the musicians reported that the sounds were unpleasant, whereas non-musicians were much less sensitive,” Assoc. Prof Wilson said.
 “This highlights the importance of training the brain to like particular variations of combinations of sounds like those found in jazz or rock.” 


Depending on their training, a strange chord or a gong sound was accurately pitched and pleasant to some musicians, but impossible to pitch and very unpleasant to others. “This showed us that even the ability to hear a musical pitch (or note) is learnt,” Assoc. Prof Wilson said.


To confirm this finding they trained 19 non-musicians to find the pitches of a random selection of western chords. Not only did the participants ability to hear notes improve rapidly over ten short sessions, afterward they reported that the chords they had learnt sounded more pleasant – regardless of how the chords were tuned.

The question of why some combinations of musical notes are heard as pleasant or unpleasant has long been debated. “We have shown in this study that for music, beauty is in the brain of the beholder,” Assoc. Prof McLachlan said. The study was published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

August 16, 2012

headlikeanorange:

Aurora australis in Antarctica. (Planet Earth - BBC)

(via fuckyeah-stars)

July 13, 2012
Lessons Learned

Wow, the last couple weeks have been pretty crazy. From making my first live action production to trying to get folks to vote on it, I definitely had lots of fun, but it wasn’t without lessons learned on the way. Several things I learned by producing my first live action video:

- Learn to Trust your DP. That’s easy because Sun Kim killed it. Check out his other works on the Widescreen Eye Films Vimeo page or his personal YouTube page.

- Talk quicker. That’s one piece of consistent feedback I got on set. In high school I had a civics teacher who marked people down whenever they said ‘um’ in a presentation. But lo and behold, did you know that in the real world, stall words are said to let people know that you’re thinking?

- Have a Get Out the Vote Campaign. Either have an organized way to get out the vote, or don’t enter your videos in a voting contest. Getting people to vote daily is cumbersome at best and an annoyance at worst. It’s selfish and slimy and a good way for Expedia to get their name out there at young filmmakers’ expense. It also strains relationships.

- Have a story. Make people care about your video. People can be doing anything in the world at the moment, why do they have to stop and watch your video? Nobody is obligated to give you anything—views, likes, favorites—you have to earn it. Create something compelling emotionally.

- Coverage. Have more coverage and B Rolls. You’ll thank yourself in the edit.

- Chill out more. I definitely had a hard time relaxing on set—for obvious reasons—but definitely stay loose and cool. The loose and cool version of me is definitely more fun to be around than the anxiety-stricken panic-ridden version of me, which is what I was to some extent at certain times.

So, I lost the vote campaign and didn’t get to Top Ten, and I’m not sure where my life is headed after this—but it was definitely fun to make the Find Your Love video. Once again, here it is: https://vimeo.com/44617663

Just imagine it as a love story, without the Expedia branding :)

July 6, 2012

Find Your Love Expedia, feat We Could Happen by AJ Rafael!

Please check out this short film I made for Expedia’s contest, featuring “We Could Happen” by AJ Rafael!

When I figured out that I had a concrete story to tell for Expedia’s contest, I immediately thought of We Could Happen—I approached AJ through mutual acquaintances, showed him the storyboards, and got his ok. Through three days of rigorous shooting and a tight budget, we finally got the finished product after a make-or-break editing session.

Now my video is done and we just need votes! 

We need a top ten finish to be considered by judges. Unfortunately, we are currently hanging around 10th - 11th place. Please support AJ’s music & vote for it here: http://tinyurl.com/86dxwap 

Voting happens daily til the 9th!

Win or lose, I know that this is just another stepping stone in my film career. But now that it’s made, we might as well take it all the way, right? So please vote daily & share!  Thanks so so much! We could happen!

-Jimmy Zhang

July 5, 2012
aworthyendeavor:

sci-fact:


Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy) was published 325 years ago today, July 5th, 1687. It is justly regarded as one of the most important works in the history of science, laying down the foundations of classical mechanics and revolutionizing applied mathematics.


One of the most important single works in human history. 

aworthyendeavor:

sci-fact:

Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy) was published 325 years ago today, July 5th, 1687. It is justly regarded as one of the most important works in the history of science, laying down the foundations of classical mechanics and revolutionizing applied mathematics.

One of the most important single works in human history. 

(via likeaphysicist)

July 3, 2012

Attention everyone, AJ Rafael’s music could be used as Expedia’s web commercial!

Please check out this short film I made for Expedia’s contest, featuring “We Could Happen” by AJ Rafael!

When I figured out that I had a concrete story to tell for Expedia’s contest, I immediately thought of We Could Happen—I approached AJ through mutual acquaintances, showed him the storyboards, and got his ok. Through three days of rigorous shooting and a tight budget, we finally got the finished product after a make-or-break editing session.

Now my video is done and we just need votes! 

We need a top ten finish to be considered by judges. Unfortunately, we are currently hanging around 10th - 11th place. Please support AJ’s music & vote for it here: http://tinyurl.com/86dxwap 

Voting happens daily til the 9th!

Win or lose, I know that this is just another stepping stone in my film career. But now that it’s made, we might as well take it all the way, right? So please vote daily & share!  Thanks so so much! We could happen!

-Jimmy Zhang

July 3, 2012
weandthecolor:

Hands in Hand - Drawing
The illustration by Julien Poisson started as a little hand study, but after a while it was getting to a hand made out of other hands.
via: WE AND THE COLORFacebook // Twitter // Google+ // Pinterest

weandthecolor:

Hands in Hand - Drawing

The illustration by Julien Poisson started as a little hand study, but after a while it was getting to a hand made out of other hands.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »